Kenyan teachers have expressed outrage following the adoption of amendments to the Kenya Union of Post-Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET) constitution that significantly raise payment rates for union leaders. The amendments, passed by acclamation during a National Executive Board (NEB) meeting, have been labeled by critics as “draconian” and exploitative.
The amendments include increased allowances for various union leaders, prompting accusations of prioritizing personal enrichment over addressing teachers’ welfare. Many teachers have voiced their displeasure, accusing KUPPET of turning educators into “slaves of the union.”
Newly Amended Payment Rates for KUPPET Leaders
| Position | Monthly Payment (Ksh) |
|---|---|
| National Secretary Tertiary | 300,000 |
| Assistant National Treasurer | 300,000 |
| Executive Secretary | 200,000 |
| Branch Chairman | 100,000 |
| Branch Treasurer | 100,000 |
| Vice Chairman | 50,000 |
| Assistant Secretary | 50,000 |
| Vice Treasurer | 50,000 |
| Organizing Secretary | 50,000 |
| Gender Secretary | 50,000 |
| Secretary Secondary | 50,000 |
| Secretary Tertiary | 50,000 |
Teachers React
The new payment structure has sparked widespread criticism, with teachers accusing the NEB of sidelining their grievances. “Hired goons have passed these amendments without considering the plight of teachers,” one teacher lamented.
Critics argue that the funds allocated for these payments could have been better utilized to address urgent issues such as delayed promotions, understaffing, and poor working conditions.
Concerns Over Acclamation Voting
Many teachers have raised concerns about the use of acclamation to pass the amendments, describing the process as undemocratic. Calls for a more transparent voting system have been made to ensure inclusivity and fairness in decision-making.
Calls for Action
Disgruntled educators are urging the union to reverse the amendments and focus on their core mandate of championing the rights and welfare of teachers. “KUPPET leaders must remember they are elected to serve teachers, not themselves,” a teacher stated.
The controversy has sparked debates about the union’s accountability and the need for reforms to ensure fair representation of teachers’ interests.
