Nairobi, Kenya – 27th June 2025 – The Law Society of Kenya (LSK), under the leadership of President Faith Odhiambo, has issued a scathing condemnation of the government’s response to the nationwide demonstrations held on 25th June 2025. In a strongly worded press statement, the LSK rebuked what it termed as “reckless and unconstitutional” remarks by Cabinet Secretary Onesmus Kipchumba Murkomen, who appeared to endorse police excesses, including extrajudicial killings.
The legal body distanced itself from political bias, reaffirming its neutrality, commitment to the rule of law, and constitutional mandate. The statement also warned police officers against acting on illegal shoot-to-kill orders, threatening legal action against those who violate human rights.
LSK Denounces Political Allegations, Reaffirms Neutrality
The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) dismissed claims that it was advancing a political agenda, clarifying that its role is strictly governed by Section 4 of the LSK Act, which mandates neutrality, objectivity, and fidelity to the law.
“The Law Society of Kenya operates in strict conformity to the statutory framework that governs its mandate. Our allegiance lies with the rule of law, the Constitution, the public interest, and our membership—any suggestion to the contrary is preposterous,” the statement read.
Faith Odhiambo, the LSK President, emphasized that the society’s duty is to advise government institutions, the judiciary, and the public on legal matters—not to engage in partisan politics.
LSK Slams Murkomen’s “Shoot-to-Kill” Remarks
The Law Society of Kenya expressed “great revulsion” over comments made by Interior CS Murkomen, who appeared to condone police brutality during the protests.
“We are disenchanted that a sworn Advocate of the High Court of Kenya and member of the LSK is capable, in good conscience, of not only encouraging police belligerence but congratulating it and promising to undermine court orders,” the statement said.
The LSK reminded Murkomen that, as a State Officer and lawyer, he is bound by:
- Chapter 6 of the Constitution (Leadership and Integrity)
- His oath as an Advocate (to uphold the rule of law)
The society dismissed Murkomen’s remarks as “legally impotent”, stressing that extrajudicial killings are unconstitutional.
Police Use of Force Must Be Lawful – LSK Warns
The Law Society of Kenya clarified that police use of firearms is strictly regulated under:
- Section 61 of the National Police Service Act
- The Sixth Schedule (which limits lethal force to cases of imminent threat to life)
“The issuance of firearms does not come with unconstrained power to use them against civilians. Any extrajudicial killing will be treated as a premeditated crime,” the LSK warned.
The statement further cautioned the Inspector General of Police against allowing officers to act on illegal orders, warning that command responsibility would apply.
LSK Vows to Defend Human Rights Amid Protests
While urging protesters to demonstrate peacefully and within the law, the Law Society of Kenya condemned state-sponsored violence.
“We cannot entertain nefarious threats on the lives and well-being of the sovereign people. We will remain persistent in calling out human rights atrocities,” the statement concluded.
The LSK, led by President Faith Odhiambo, reaffirmed its commitment to holding the government accountable and ensuring justice for victims of police brutality.
Key Takeaways from LSK’s Statement
- LSK remains neutral – It does not support any political faction.
- Murkomen’s remarks are illegal – Endorsing police killings violates the Constitution.
- Police must follow the law – Unjustified use of force will lead to prosecutions.
- LSK will defend human rights – No tolerance for extrajudicial killings.
What’s Next? Legal Battles & Public Pressure
The Law Society of Kenya’s statement sets the stage for:
- Possible lawsuits against police officers involved in unlawful killings.
- Increased scrutiny on CS Murkomen’s conduct as a lawyer and state officer.
- Continued advocacy for protestors’ rights amid rising tensions.
As the situation develops, Faith Odhiambo and the LSK are expected to remain at the forefront of legal resistance against state excesses.
Final Thoughts: A Defining Moment for Kenya’s Rule of Law
The Law Society of Kenya’s bold stance highlights the growing tension between civil liberties and state power. With Faith Odhiambo leading the charge, the LSK has positioned itself as a key defender of constitutional order.
Will the government backtrack on its controversial shoot-to-kill policy? Or will Kenya face more legal and political turmoi?
